Geschichte

RC Hang Gliding on the Hoch-Ybrig

von H. R. Schläpfer
4

Organization: Region 5



Higher demands on flight performance and tactical skills

The RCS Swiss Slope Gliding Championship from the perspective of a member of the RC Gliding Subcommittee.

The Swiss Championship held on September 4, 1977, at Hoch-Ybrig marked the conclusion of a year of gathering experience with the new provisional RC slope gliding regulations. Over the course of the year, we received specific proposals from various model aviation regions for improving the regulations, with the overwhelming majority rating the newly designed program very positively. Our goal was to place higher demands on the pilots’ flying performance and tactical skills, as well as on the models themselves.



should. As the reactions from our competitors confirm, we have succeeded in this. However, some details need to be revised to improve the competition in practice.

The biggest problem with RC gliding competitions in general arises time and again at the regional qualifiers, which, in the major model flying regions, attract over 100 competitors. At the Swiss Championship, the competition could not begin until 12:00 p.m. due to very poor weather. With 40 competitors, divided into groups of four, we were nevertheless able to complete four rounds. Spread over these five hours, this amounts to an average of 1 1/4 hours per round, or two minutes per competitor.

With 120 competitors and groups of five for each start, approximately three hours per round would need to be allocated. This means that only two rounds can be held in a single day of competition. That is simply far too few for RC gliding competitions. The element of chance involved in Switzerland’s constantly changing updraft conditions will turn any RC gliding competition with only two rounds into a farce. There can be no question of a fair competition.

Furthermore, it was noted by various parties that the current scoring system does not produce enough rankings. As a solution, it was proposed to include the actual flight time in the scoring. This shortcoming was particularly evident under weak updraft conditions.


When we in the RC Gliding Subcommittee were considering the time factor, we came up with a solution that can address both of the above-mentioned problems at once:

The revised regulations will introduce a group-based scoring system. This means that the pilot in each starting group who achieves the best performance within that group will receive 1,000 points for that performance. The remaining pilots in the same starting group will receive a percentage of the points based on the performance of the group’s winner.

Such a solution opens up entirely new possibilities in RC slope soaring. The influence of constantly changing updraft conditions during the course of a heat is completely eliminated. Even if the wind direction shifts during a heat, pilots can immediately switch to the alternate slope without having to wait for the heat to end.

Under these circumstances, there is no need for a discard result, which gives pilots who deliver consistent performance a better chance.

Based on this, we recalculated the results of the Swiss Championship and found that this approach yielded a clear ranking. However, the pilots were not prepared for such a scoring system.

However, the inclusion of actual flight time in the scoring can be omitted.


However, to ensure that competitions with group-based scoring are truly fair, it was necessary to mandate a flawless random draw of competitors for the starting groups, with names concealed and under supervision. Furthermore, it was objected that the time available after crossing the finish line until landing was too short. We have addressed this issue by proposing to increase this time from the current 30 seconds to 60 seconds. However, the discipline time is to remain unchanged at 8 minutes. It became very clear that the required total distance of the triangle—600 meters—is too long in practice. The proposed reduction to 300 meters will also help differentiate the rankings more clearly and corresponds to the distance already successfully used in practice. Due to varying interpretations, it was decided to define the start/finish line more clearly and to establish guidelines regarding the limited width of the line.

We are convinced that these changes—even though it is impossible to cover every eventuality in a set of rules—will make the RC hang gliding competition even more interesting and, above all, fairer for the competitors.

The result should truly depend on the performance of the pilot and the model, and no longer solely on luck.

We have therefore submitted a corresponding amendment proposal to the RC FAKO and hope that we will be able to definitively implement these revised rules in 1978.

I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank all my fellow modelers who have taken the time to support us with constructive criticism, whether verbal or written.

Since these regulations are certainly not set in stone and will inevitably require revisions and new approaches, we are already asking all model aircraft pilots to share their experiences, suggestions, and critiques with us on an ongoing basis or to forward them to the RC FAKO via the regional technical advisors.

We rely on a strong response from the ranks of our competitors.



We would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank you for your ongoing constructive criticism, whether verbal or written.

Since these regulations are certainly not set in stone and will inevitably require revisions and new approaches, we ask all model aviators to share their experiences, suggestions, and feedback with us on an ongoing basis or to forward them to the RC FAKO via the regional technical advisors.

We rely on a strong response from the ranks of our competitors.



RCS Slope on the Hoch-Ybrig

Organization: Region 5


Rankings
1. Marcel ScherrerWE3250
2. Ruedi BaumgartnerWT2850
3. Ernst HaigisSG2750
4. Andreas MüllerTA2550
5. H. J. BindemannBZ2450
6. Stürchler, PaulBR2400
7. Stephan EnglerWO2350
Peter DislerMayor2350
René HunzikerLY2350
10. Armin RöthlisbergerTU2300
Marc SchnyderEM2300
12. Jürg SteinmannOB2000
13. Hansjürg WeberRO1950
Peter RascherEL1950
15. Bruno MiottiWT1900
16. Kurt NünlistGT1800
Eich, KurtRO1800
18. Rumpold, HelmutWT1750
19. Frank ZülsdorfSG1700
20. Edgar GautschiWT1650
21. Peter MeierOB1600
22. Bruno MeuwliFG1450
Zeltner, PeterSB1450
24. Rolf HentschiBL1400
25. R. DietschiNE1300
Hefti PeterEB1300
Hans GrünenwaldWE1300
28. Rudolf SchaubMB1150
29. Philippe ViretGE1050
Karl HürlimannWH1050
31. Paul KundelaRS1000
Kälin KarlEI1000
33. Arnold FurerTU850
Henseler, WalterEM850
35. Lucian AntonRS700
36. Ueli GerberTU550
Karl OchsenbeinEI550
38. Marcel BachmannEM400
39. Hans BeerLS300
40. Gemperle KurtDI250
41. Ernst GerberTU150


Left: You can see quite clearly here that they can't get their act together—it actually rained that morning... Apparently, someone put it even more bluntly, using language befitting his upbringing.




Show all categories →

NEWS

Sort by:
Further articles →



An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙